- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:28:44 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4329
Summary: R-222: Drop the XMLSchema-datatypes namespace?
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0 only
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
BugsThisDependsOn: 2214
This issue was raised at the May 2003 f2f. See:
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/05/xml-schema-ftf-minutes#d0e750
XML Schema Part 2 suggests that the XMLSchema-datatypes URI is an alias for the
xmlschema namespace URI:
"To facilitate usage in specifications other than the XML Schema definition
language, such as those that do not want to know anything about aspects of the
XML Schema definition language other than the datatypes, each built-in datatype
is also defined in the namespace whose URI is:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-
datatypes "
while the documentation in the schema for the XMLSchema-datatypes suggests a
different relationship, which is consistent with the notion of one-name-per-
component:
<documentation>Note this schema is NOT a normative schema - - It contains types
derived from all the builtin simple type definitions with the same local name
but in a distinct namespace, for use by applications which do no wish to import
the full XMLSchema schema. Since derivation is not symmetric, unexpected
results may follow from mixing references to these definitions with references
to the definitions in the XMLSchema namespace. For example, although
dt:positiveInteger is derived from xs:integer, the converse does not
hold.<documentation>
See bug 2214 for resolution of this issue in schema 1.1.
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 15:28:56 UTC