- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:07:37 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4299
Summary: lax wildcard and xsi:type
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0/1.1 both
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Assume that in an instance document, element "e" matches a lax wildcard and
there is no global element declaration for "e" and there is an xsi:type
specified on it. How *valid* does the xsi:type need to be?
Not a qname:
<e xsi:type="a b c d"/>
Not resolve to a type:
<e xsi:type="randomNN:randomName"/>
This doesn't seem to be covered by Schema-Validity Assessment (Element) in
3.3.4. Does this mean it's valid (and should be treated as if xsi:type is not
there)? Is this the intention?
See this exchange (member-only)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Mar/0098.html
Received on Monday, 5 February 2007 22:07:42 UTC