- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:07:37 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4299 Summary: lax wildcard and xsi:type Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0/1.1 both Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Assume that in an instance document, element "e" matches a lax wildcard and there is no global element declaration for "e" and there is an xsi:type specified on it. How *valid* does the xsi:type need to be? Not a qname: <e xsi:type="a b c d"/> Not resolve to a type: <e xsi:type="randomNN:randomName"/> This doesn't seem to be covered by Schema-Validity Assessment (Element) in 3.3.4. Does this mean it's valid (and should be treated as if xsi:type is not there)? Is this the intention? See this exchange (member-only) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Mar/0098.html
Received on Monday, 5 February 2007 22:07:42 UTC