- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:19:41 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3120 ------- Comment #2 from David_E3@VERIFONE.com 2007-06-26 15:19 ------- Proposed by the WG at the June 2007 f2f 1 we retain pD in our spec 2 when we enter CR, we mark pD as a feature at risk 3 exit criteria for retaining pD after CR include (a) implementations in the context of XML Schema, (b) uptake outside of XML Schema, (c) state of the relevant IEEE specs 4 we agree that clarity is needed on the operational semantics; we think that Don Chamberlin's note at [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-query-wg/2006May/0023.html ] provides the requisite semantics (assuming his open questions get decided) 5 we're aware there's a need to say something about the transition. QT and Schema should work together on this problem.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 15:19:43 UTC