- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 00:50:28 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3945 ------- Comment #3 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2007-05-02 00:50 ------- Comment #2 should have added explicitly that the Working Group requests that Derek Johnson, as the originator of the issue, indicate whether you are satisfied with the WG's response and its rationale, either by changing the status of the bug to CLOSED, to indicate that you are content with the disposition of the question (or at least resigned to it), or else by changing it to REOPENED to indicate that you're not satisified and wish the WG to reconsider (or failing that, that you wish to lodge a formal objection to the WG's decision and appeal it to the Director at the next document review). In the latter case, it would be helpful if you respond to the ideas in comment #1. If we don't hear from you in a couple of weeks, we'll assume that silence implies consent, and close the issue on your behalf. Thank you!
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 00:50:30 UTC