- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:24:46 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3224 ------- Comment #10 from davep@iit.edu 2007-04-20 18:24 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Not that they cannot be compared. In fact, they can be compared, and the > answers are that 23 <> 2007-04-20 is true, and 23 = 2007-04-20, 23 < > 2007-04-20, and 23 > 2007-04-20 are all three false. Of the derived > comparisons, 23 != 2007-04-20 is true, and 23 <= 2007-04-20 and 23 >= > 2007-04-20 aree false. As I think about it, in fact "<>" is just as much a derived relation as are "!=", "<=", and ">=". The other three are in some sense primitive and these four (and the negations of "<" and ">", which we do not suggest a notation for, and do not use) are defined in terms of the first three. Admittedly other choices of three primitives from the nine are possible and the other six defined therefrom; this just happens to be a common choice and the one we've used to explain our use of all.
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 18:25:29 UTC