- From: Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:20:53 -0400
- To: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFAEC48E97.A1F11CF9-ON852572B3.00491C89-852572B3.004953EA@ca.ibm.com>
> > A new attribute "defaultAttributes" is introduced on the <schema> element, > > whose value is a QName as a reference to an attribute group definition. When > > this attribute is specified, all complex types defined withint this <schema> > > gets the attribute group as if a reference to it was specified in > > <complexType>. Complex types can use an attribute > "defaultAttributesApply" to > > indicate whether such defaulting is desired. > > Does "defined within this <schema>" include redefined? Not sure I > have an opinion, but I think it should be clear whichever way. Yes, it does. The text will look like "if the <schema> ancestor has ...", which applies to both anonymous types and types defined under <redefine>. Thanks, Sandy Gao XML Parser Development, IBM Canada (1-905) 413-3255 sandygao@ca.ibm.com www-xml-schema-comments-request@w3.org wrote on 2007-04-02 12:38:37 PM: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > bugzilla writes: > > > A new attribute "defaultAttributes" is introduced on the <schema> element, > > whose value is a QName as a reference to an attribute group definition. When > > this attribute is specified, all complex types defined withint this <schema> > > gets the attribute group as if a reference to it was specified in > > <complexType>. Complex types can use an attribute > "defaultAttributesApply" to > > indicate whether such defaulting is desired. > > Does "defined within this <schema>" include redefined? Not sure I > have an opinion, but I think it should be clear whichever way. > > ht > - -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh > Half-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFGETGNkjnJixAXWBoRAknpAJ9j1Ic+aCIZ8MSxz9BSzpNgcRgawACePFZm > tmi8L19v0fQh+4bkq35h08k= > =AhmD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 13:21:11 UTC