- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 08:49:33 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
ht@inf.ed.ac.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
------- Comment #2 from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk 2007-04-02 08:49 -------
"As shown, schema document is not valid because it lacks an import.
"The specification is not ambiguous about this."
I don't agree. The spec says, wrt this namespace, "All schema processors have
appropriate attribute declarations for these attributes built in". We
certainly do _not_ require an import for the other namespace which is built-in,
namely the Schema namespace itself. The spec. as written actually _does_
appear to require an import for http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema, in that
clause 4.2 of "Schema Representation Constraint: QName resolution (Schema
Document)" does not explicitly provide for any exceptions.
So until we clarify that _only_ the Schema namespace itself is special in this
regard, I think the spec. _is_ ambiguous, and should be fixed.
Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 08:49:41 UTC