- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:37:29 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3040
john.hockaday@ga.gov.au changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |john.hockaday@ga.gov.au
Severity|normal |trivial
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Comment #2 from john.hockaday@ga.gov.au 2006-09-27 01:37 -------
I'm not sure what spec you are suggesting I have misunderstood. I am referring
to ISO 8601:2004 section 4.1.2.3 "Representation with reduced accuracy". It
provides very clear definitions of this representation with three examples as
follows:
"1985-04" for a specific month of a specific year,
"1985" for a specfic year and
"19" for a specific century.
I don't see how I can misunderstand the content of section 4.1.2.3 of ISO
8601:2004 in this respect.
It seems to me that you have not allowed for this very important reduced
accuracy representation of dates as it is *very* common for only the century,
year or month to be known.
I look forward to your response to this need.
Thanks.
John
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2006 01:37:32 UTC