[Bug 2625] Clause 3.3 of Derivation Valid (Restriction, Simple) unclear

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2625


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
           Keywords|unclassified                |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org  2006-09-24 15:27 -------
The changes made in January 2006 in connection with unions with
other unions as their member types, included the deletion of the
relevant item and the insertion of a constraint saying that it
must be the case that

  The Simple Type Definition is not a member of its own 
  transitive membership.

with that, this item can be marked closed.  As the originator,
I am able to confirm that I am satisfied with this resolution.

While checking this issue, however, I discovered that the version
of the spec showing diffs against 1.0 omits the text of the
clause in question, but does not omit its number.  There appears
to be a problem in (a) the diff markup in the XML source, or
(b) the diff group disposition files used to produce the spec,
or (c) the diff-group processing stylesheet, or (d) more than
one of the above.  The editors need to fix those, and I'll leave
this item marked 'resolved' instead of 'closed' until it's clear
that the problem has been successfully fixed.

Received on Sunday, 24 September 2006 15:27:16 UTC