- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:32:45 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1889 mike@saxonica.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Comment #4 from mike@saxonica.com 2006-09-21 07:32 ------- I fail to understand how five-and-a-half years after the XML Schema specification came out, the WG has failed to resolve a simple technical problem that has been known for nearly all that time, and can now deem that the problem will be allowed to remain in the next release of the specification. This isn't something that's difficult to resolve because of environment dependencies or implementation difficulties or political hassles or because it's at the boundaries of computer science. It's a simple straightforward bug. Schema implementors and schema authors have been tripping over this issue, even W3C working groups have been publishing schemas that work with some processors and not others. Moreover, the QT specifications are impacted because they refer normatively to the regex definitions in Schema Part 2. Closing this as WONTFIX seems to show a wanton disregard for quality. If it's not the purpose of a 1.1 release to fix such problems, what is the purpose?
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2006 07:32:53 UTC