- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:05:20 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2180
cmsmcq@w3.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Keywords|unclassified |resolved
Resolution| |LATER
------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2006-09-20 23:05 -------
At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg,
the Working Group discussed this issue. While there was some
sentiment for giving it a high priority, in the end the Working
Group decided not to take further action on this issue in XML
Schema 1.1.
The rationale for the Working Group's decision was that while
real, the design inconsistency identified in the issue does not
actually involve any logical inconsistency, and does not seem to
be presenting an acute problem for users. While most members of
the Working Group would be glad to see this issue addressed (not
all members of the WG -- one dissenter describes this as another
instance of paternalism that complicates the spec needlessly),
the Working Group did not feel it useful to delay Datatypes 1.1
for such a change.
This issue should have been mark as RESOLVED / LATER at that
time, but apparently was not. I am marking it that way now, to
reduce confusion.
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2006 23:05:29 UTC