- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 15:06:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3685 Summary: [SCD] (Editorial) Origanize by axes Product: XML Schema Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema- wg/2006Aug/0016.html OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: SCDS: XML Schema Component Designators AssignedTo: holstege@mathling.com ReportedBy: holstege@mathling.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Originally raised in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2006Aug/0016.html by Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi@Sun.COM> - In my opinion, the spec would have been easier to read if it followed the same approach that the XPath spec took. For example, I failed to find any reference to what it really means to use the "baseType::" axis. I just had to assume that it's a traversal through the {base type definition} of the complex type and simple type schema components. To follow the XPath spec approach means saying something like this instead: The <tt>baseType</tt> axis contains the {base type definition} of the context node if the context node is a simple/complex type. Otherwise empty. The node test (by name) could be then split into its own part, eliminating any need to duplicate [target namespace] and [name] everywhere, as the current SCD spec do.
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 15:06:11 UTC