[Bug 3027] erroneous date example

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3027





------- Comment #1 from davep@iit.edu  2006-09-01 21:57 -------
(In reply to comment #0)

> This section states, "2000-12-12+13:00 = 2000-12-13-11:00  (whereas under 1.0,
> as just stated,  2000-12-12+13:00 = 2000-12-12-11:00)".  I believe that the
> initial "=" should be "!=".

As the WG was about to accept this recommendation, we realized that the words
are correct as stated.  Note that in the first equation, true in 1.1, the date
on the LHS
is 12 Dec and on the RHS it is 13 Dec.  OTOH, in the equation in parens, true
in 1.0,
the dates on both sides are 12 Dec.

The WG directed the editors to provide a Note more clearly explaining what is
being
pointed out in this comparison.

Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 21:57:44 UTC