- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 18:51:15 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3573 ------- Comment #3 from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 2006-08-02 18:51 ------- Michael Sperberg-McQueen writes: > I agree with almost all of NM's comment, Good! > except for his implicit suggestion that he > objects to the alternate text proposed in > the initial description because it says that > the spec has "nothing to say" on the matter. I spoke a bit too loosely. The concern was specifically with the phrase "this specification imposes no restrictions on processors after an error is detected." I think we do want to impose a restriction, which is not to ever confuse in the output of the processor results of such post-error processing with results that might have come from non-error cases. Seems like we agree on the result if not quite the way I first justified it, so I'm inclined to say we're all set. Do you agree? Thanks. Noah
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2006 18:51:18 UTC