Saturday, 30 September 2006
- [Bug 3078] Explain apparent contradiction re: order of durations
- [Bug 3078] Explain apparent contradiction re: order of durations
- [Bug 3026] value space of xs:duration has been expanded
Friday, 29 September 2006
- XML Schema 1.1: Making Global & Validation Root Element explicit
- [Bug 2957] XML Query untyped values
- [Bug 2235] R-243: Can an attribute prohibited by restriction be added back through a subsequent extension?
- [Bug 2866] RQ-97 Allow typed wildcards (typed-wildcards)
- [Bug 2834] RQ-99 Allow an element to be in more than one substitution group (mult-subs-grps)
- [Bug 3725] Editorial: 'context-determined declarations' needs work
Wednesday, 27 September 2006
- [Bug 3223] Literals in the value space?
- [Bug 3673] revisit (and enlarge) XPath subset for assertions?
- [Bug 3223] Literals in the value space?
- [Bug 3223] Literals in the value space?
- RE: Assertions in Schema 1.1 Part 1
- [Bug 3254] Consistency of document versions
- [Bug 3257] "order with" in 3.3.8.1
- [Bug 3254] Consistency of document versions
- [Bug 3255] Datatype for seconds component of a duration
- [Bug 3257] "order with" in 3.3.8.1
- [Bug 3255] Datatype for seconds component of a duration
- [Bug 3040] Date and dateTime formats do not allow some valid ISO 8601 values
- [Bug 2554] Should UPA be a model group or particle constraint?
- Re: Assertions in Schema 1.1 Part 1
- [Bug 3040] Date and dateTime formats do not allow some valid ISO 8601 values
Tuesday, 26 September 2006
- Assertions in Schema 1.1 Part 1
- [Bug 3246] Leading plus sign
- [Bug 3223] Literals in the value space?
Monday, 25 September 2006
- Re: comments on Proposed Edited Recommendation for XML Schema Second Edition
- [Bug 2243] R-251: 2E PER: Probable editorial problem, mix/maxExclusive facets
- [Bug 2236] R-244: Clarification requested for Appendix E
Sunday, 24 September 2006
- [Bug 2827] RQ-143 Question about assessment outcome for attributes (AssessmentOfAtts)
- [Bug 2578] What does last paragraph of 3.2.5 mean?
- [Bug 2625] Clause 3.3 of Derivation Valid (Restriction, Simple) unclear
- [Bug 2577] xsi loc = redefine loc -- what happens?
- [Bug 2554] Should UPA be a model group or particle constraint?
- [Bug 2242] R-250: 2E PER: Comments on rcase-MapAndSum
- [Bug 3764] R-250: 2E PER: Comments on rcase-MapAndSum
Saturday, 23 September 2006
- [Bug 2234] R-242: Part 1: final attribute of simpleType
- [Bug 2233] R-241: Question re: Validation of an element restriction whose base type has the variety union
- Re: Validation of an element restriction whose base type has the variety union
- [Bug 2233] R-241: Question re: Validation of an element restriction whose base type has the variety union
- [Bug 3763] R-241: Question re: Validation of an element restriction whose base type has the variety union
- [Bug 2232] R-240: Question re: Particle Derivation OK (All/Choice/Sequence:Any -- NSRecurseCheckCardinality)
- [Bug 2209] R-217: Potential problem with Derivation Valid (Restriction, Complex)
- [Bug 2208] R-216: Potential problem with Name and Type OK
- [Bug 2208] R-216: Potential problem with Name and Type OK
- [Bug 2204] R-212: Question about VR Element Locally Valid (Element) in Structures 3.3.4
- [Bug 2829] RQ-156 Outlaw complex types with mixed simple content (mixedSimple)
- [Bug 3054] Availability of type definition
- [Bug 3047] RQ-153 Schema 1.1 Namespace (xsd-1.1-namespace)
- [Bug 3573] Validation and invalid schemas
Friday, 22 September 2006
- [Bug 2659] lc-2: simple barenames for schema component designators
- [Bug 2659] lc-2: simple barenames for schema component designators
- [Bug 2662] lc-5: Rule out default namespace
- [Bug 3677] [SCD] Numeric predicates confusing
- [Bug 3681] [SCD] missing component::* from BNF
- [Bug 3680] [SCD] Path abbreviations confusing
- [Bug 3683] [SCD] Allow for ./ in paths
- [Bug 3684] [SCD] // confusing
- [Bug 3682] [SCD] ModelGroupStep production error
- [Bug 3033] Canonical form for float/double should match F&O semantics.
- [Bug 2911] Editorial WD 2006-02-17: pattern valid
- [Bug 3078] Explain apparent contradiction re: order of durations
- [Bug 2728] super/sub -set constraints missing for born-binary pattern, enumeration respectively
- [Bug 3224] Inequality
Wednesday, 13 September 2006
Tuesday, 12 September 2006
Monday, 18 September 2006
Monday, 26 June 2006
Thursday, 21 September 2006
- [Bug 2216] R-224: Questions about metacharacters in regular expressions
- [Bug 2123] R-134: Treatment of ^ in regexes
- [Bug 1889] Regex [+-] syntax
- [Bug 2758] wd-33: Are lexical maps functions or relations?
- [Bug 2755] wd-29: URI changes in RFC 3986
- [Bug 2178] R-184: Question about pattern and union types
- [Bug 2227] R-235: Canonical rep'n of -0.0
- [Bug 2744] wd-18: Duplicate normative parts in Part 1 (3.14) and 2 (4.1)
- [Bug 2865] RQ-4 Address localization issues with datatypes (localization)
- [Bug 2864] RQ-3 Address localization issues with date and time types (datetime-localization)
- [Bug 2750] wd-24: Regarding upper and lower bounds (another problem with paternalism)
- [Bug 2759] wd-34: What are the rules for list equality?
- [Bug 2123] R-134: Treatment of ^ in regexes
- [Bug 2763] enumeration facet can't be used on boolean
- [Bug 2216] R-224: Questions about metacharacters in regular expressions
- [Bug 2188] R-195: Correct error in the description of order for dateTime
- [Bug 2423] Clearly define value equality
- [Bug 2080] R-090: Questions about the lexical and canonical rep'ns of dateTime
- [Bug 1969] Should Part 2 make the component tableaux normative?
- [Bug 2190] R-197: Add warning on whitespace processing
- [Bug 1889] Regex [+-] syntax
- [Bug 2049] R-182: clarify equality and identity of union values
- [Bug 1852] RQ-141b -- Changes to Part 2 to align with Part 1 (Requirement)
Wednesday, 20 September 2006
- [Bug 2744] wd-18: Duplicate normative parts in Part 1 (3.14) and 2 (4.1)
- [Bug 2075] R-085: Request for clarification of QName type
- [Bug 2251] R-259: Are QNames without prefix bindings type-valid?
- [Bug 2200] R-208: Question about the lexical space of NOTATION types
- [Bug 2088] R-098: must lexical form map to a value?
- [Bug 2734] Simple type property values for ordinary built-in types
- [Bug 1842] Consider effect of XML 1.1-based XSD types on Schema 1.1 adoption
- [Bug 2609] Fix/Move Single Facet Valid from part 2 to part 1
- [Bug 2315] Where Parts 1 and 2 share topics, what is normative where?
- [Bug 2453] Wrt simpleType, which Part has which subsections normative
- [Bug 2180] R-186: Constraints for min/maxIn/Exclusive facets
- [Bug 1916] lexical mappings are relations, not necessarily functions
- [Bug 2314] R-200: Problem with erratum E1-18 (datatypes)
- [Bug 2046] R-181 (Datatypes): clarify equality and identity of lists
- [Bug 3230] Atomic = not decomposable?
Tuesday, 19 September 2006
- [Bug 3754] UPA-constraint causing principal problems in document authoring
- [Bug 2199] R-207: Question about wildcard restriction
- [Bug 2196] R-204: ComplexType mapping rule issue: min=max=0
- [Bug 2195] R-202: How many components are there for complextype extensions?
- [Bug 2842] RQ-134 Origin of inherited portions of content model (scd-origin-inheritance)
- [Bug 2822] RQ-144 Define processor-conformance profiles (WhichPSVIPropertiesReqd)
- [Bug 2246] R-254: Clarify merge/union of facets
- [Bug 2246] R-254: Clarify merge/union of facets
- [Bug 2781] restriction relation among facet values needed
- [Bug 2742] wd-14: Editorial note on section 5.2
- [Bug 2742] wd-14: Editorial note on section 5.2
- [Bug 3659] Bugs in date/time regexes
- [Bug 2867] RQ-9 Expand wildcard namespace constraints (wildcard-ns-sets)
- Re: FW: About those "non-deterministic content model" errors
- Re: Wildcards v xsl:stylesheet
- Re: XML Schema 1.1 suggestion - allow defining of namespaces for named elements or attributes
Monday, 18 September 2006
- [Bug 2867] RQ-9 Expand wildcard namespace constraints (wildcard-ns-sets)
- [Bug 2831] RQ-158 Suggestion for change to Primer PO Example (decimalZip)
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example
- [Bug 2723] Start assessment from simple type
- [Bug 3736] canonical mappings should be presented uniformly
- [Bugzilla] Your account www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org is being impersonated
- [Bug 3224] Inequality
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example
Saturday, 16 September 2006
Friday, 15 September 2006
Thursday, 14 September 2006
Wednesday, 13 September 2006
- [Bug 3724] Rule "Content type restricts" needs clarification
- [Bug 3714] Over-general description of [element declaration] etc
- [Bug 3713] Error describing [element declaration] and [type definition]
Tuesday, 12 September 2006
Monday, 11 September 2006
Saturday, 9 September 2006
- [Bug 3244] Sets of lists
- [Bug 2948] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: use order relation for min/max facets
- [Bug 3229] Lexical mapping for a union type
- [Bug 3228] Lists|Unions of Lists|Unions
- [Bug 3079] RFC3066 ref
- [Bug 3078] Explain apparent contradiction re: order of durations
- [Bug 3077] Editorial nit
- [Bug 3076] Normative ref to 1.0 or 1.1 datatypes
- [Bug 3074] Conforming implementations may/MAY provide
Friday, 8 September 2006
- [Bug 2948] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: use order relation for min/max facets
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example
- [Bug 3673] revisit (and enlarge) XPath subset for assertions?
- [Bug 3685] [SCD] (Editorial) Origanize by axes
- [Bug 3684] [SCD] // confusing
- [Bug 3683] [SCD] Allow for ./ in paths
- [Bug 3682] [SCD] ModelGroupStep production error
- [Bug 3681] [SCD] missing component::* from BNF
- [Bug 3680] [SCD] Path abbreviations confusing
- [Bug 3679] Schema component for namespace
- [Bug 3678] [SCD] SCDs for attribute uses and particles
- [Bug 3677] [SCD] Numeric predicates confusing
- [Bug 3673] revisit (and enlarge) XPath subset for assertions?
Thursday, 7 September 2006
Wednesday, 6 September 2006
- [Bug 3659] Bugs in date/time regexes
- [Bug 3659] Bugs in date/time regexes
- [Bug 3659] Bugs in date/time regexes
- [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles
- [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles
- [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles
Tuesday, 5 September 2006
- Re: Problems with regular expression lexical productions (and fixed versions)
- Problems with regular expression lexical productions (and fixed versions)
Monday, 4 September 2006
Sunday, 3 September 2006
Saturday, 2 September 2006
Friday, 1 September 2006
- [Bug 3030] use of precisionDecimal in D.2.2 Lexical Mappings
- [Bug 3029] editorial nit in D.2.2 Lexical Mappings
- [Bug 3028] editorial nit in 3.4.27.1 The dayTimeDuration Lexical Space
- [Bug 3027] erroneous date example
Tuesday, 15 August 2006
Thursday, 10 August 2006
Tuesday, 8 August 2006
- [Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles
- [Bug 3587] Possibly confusing examples of decimal numbers
Thursday, 3 August 2006
Friday, 28 July 2006
Wednesday, 2 August 2006
- [Bug 3573] Validation and invalid schemas
- [Bug 3573] Validation and invalid schemas
- [Bug 3573] Validation and invalid schemas