- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:04:02 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3047 Summary: RQ-153 Schema 1.1 Namespace (xsd-1.1-namespace) Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: unclassified Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org This issue was originally reported by David Ezell. The XML Schema 1.1 specification must choose either to use the same namespace as 1.0, or to use a different namespace, or to use more than one namespace. An explicit decision should be made. In our general outline of compatibility goals for 1.1, the WG agreed that we would avoid changes to the XML transfer syntax, in order that XML Schema 1.0 processors can successfully process 1.1 schema documents. This seems to some to entail making no change in the namespace. At the same time, we also agreed that changes to the XML transfer syntax might be made nevertheless, if they were necessary in order to support versioning better. This seems to some to imply that any final decision on whether we will make breaking changes is still out; if we do, some WG members will wish to entertain the possibility of changing the namespace, or adding additional namespaces. This topic was raised in the Working Group call of 1 July 2004 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Jul/nnnn.html), and it was agreed to create a separate requirement to make it easier to track. The underlying issue applies to both Structures and Datatypes. This Bugzilla entry is for Structures. According to the requirements document, this issue has not been classified.
Received on Saturday, 25 March 2006 18:04:05 UTC