- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:39:45 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2306
cmsmcq@w3.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Keywords|needsAgreement |resolved
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2006-03-21 00:39 -------
At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg,
the Working Group discussed this issue. While there was some
sentiment for giving it a high priority, in the end the Working
Group decided not to take further action on this issue in
XML Schema 1.1.
The rationale for the Working Group's decision was simple: the
obscurity regarding anySimpleType appears not to be causing
serious difficulties in practice (our collection of a thousand
schema documents found 'in the wild' has no instances of unions
which have anySimpleType as a member), and it was not felt useful
to delay Datatypes 1.1 while the Working Group discussed this
issue further.
Accordingly, I am marking this issue as RESOLVED / WONTFIX.
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 00:39:56 UTC