- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:39:45 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2306 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Keywords|needsAgreement |resolved Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #2 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2006-03-21 00:39 ------- At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg, the Working Group discussed this issue. While there was some sentiment for giving it a high priority, in the end the Working Group decided not to take further action on this issue in XML Schema 1.1. The rationale for the Working Group's decision was simple: the obscurity regarding anySimpleType appears not to be causing serious difficulties in practice (our collection of a thousand schema documents found 'in the wild' has no instances of unions which have anySimpleType as a member), and it was not felt useful to delay Datatypes 1.1 while the Working Group discussed this issue further. Accordingly, I am marking this issue as RESOLVED / WONTFIX.
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 00:39:56 UTC