[Bug 2948] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: use order relation for min/max facets from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2006-02-28 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from January to March 2006)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:32:00 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1FE5tQ-00062X-HP@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2948





------- Additional Comments From davep@iit.edu  2006-02-28 14:33 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> minExclusive and other facets define how to compare values. From 4.3.9.3:
  <snip/> 
> Why not just rely on the already-defined order relation of the type instead of specifying "numerically" or 
> "chronologically"?

IIRC, that terminology is left over from 1.0, when we weren't so careful about defining order for each 
datatype.  In any case, the order we define for numerical and date/time datatypes is the usual "numerical" 
or "chronological" order as appropriate.

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2006 14:32:09 UTC