- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:15:27 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2948
Summary: Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: use order relation for min/max
facets
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: Macintosh
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: xan.gregg@jmp.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
minExclusive and other facets define how to compare values. From 4.3.9.3:
Validation Rule: minExclusive Valid
A value in an ·ordered· ·value space· is facet-valid with respect to ·minExclusive· if and only if:
1 if the {value} property of the numeric component in {fundamental facets} is true,
then the value ·must· be numerically greater than {value};
2 if the {value} property of the numeric component in {fundamental facets} is false
(i.e., {base type definition} is one of the date and time related datatypes), then the
value ·must· be chronologically greater than {value};
Why not just rely on the already-defined order relation of the type instead of specifying "numerically" or
"chronologically"?
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2006 04:15:29 UTC