- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:42:53 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2856
Summary: RQ-31 Provide decimal type that retains trailing zeroes
(trailing-zeroes)
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: resolved
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
This issue was originally reported by Mike Cowlishaw.
Provide a datatype which retains trailing zeroes in the lexical
representation of decimal numbers. More generally, provide a
*precision decimal* type, in which each value is associated not only
with a magnitude but also with a precision.
See
http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html#canonical-decimals:
CR-42.
Input from Straw Poll O-4
Interacts with RQ-28, RQ-30 (the same proposal discharges all).
Changed to desideratum on telcon 2002-11-21. The rationale was that
we already have a well developed proposal for this.
This item was discussed in the meeting of 2004-03-02
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/03/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html#rq-031)
This item was discussed in the meeting of 2004-04-01
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Apr/0003.html).
We reached phase-1 agreement on canonical forms and keeping a single
NaN.
This item was discussed in the meeting of 2004-05-12
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/05/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html). A
proposal to reclassify it as a non-goal was discussed briefly, and
postponed until late June.
Proposal:
Dave Peterson and Mike Cowlishaw (member-only link)
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0051.html)
Latest from Dave Peterson (member-only link)
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Dec/att-0045/01-precisionDecimal.html)
This requirement was discharged by the inclusion of the precisionDecimal
datatype in XML Schema 1.1.
(See also bug 1912, which relates to one particular aspect of this
requirement.)
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2006 01:42:55 UTC