[Bug 2820] RQ-17 Redo restriction rules (restrictn-rules)

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2820


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2006-02-10 22:20 -------
[Sorry, error in first submission.]

This issue was originally reported by Matthew Fuchs.

Remove the current rules on derivation by restriction; define legal
restrictions in terms of their effect on the language, not in terms of
a structural relationship between the base type and the derived type.

See (member-only link)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2001May/0018.html
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2001May/0018.html).

Input from Straw Poll O-14

Interacts with several other requirements; proposals for this
requirement also cover or affect RQ-11 (pointless-occs), RQ-12
(choice-vs-choice), RQ-15 (id-restriction), and RQ-146
(ElementDeclarationsConsistent).

Confirmed as Requirement at 2002-08-02 F2F. We discussed reclassifying
it and decided not to.

This item was discussed in the meetings of 2003-11-04
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/11/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html),
2004-04-09
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Apr/0178.html),
2004-04-15
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Apr/0202.html),
2004-05-06
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004May/0085.html),
2004-05-07
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004May/0086.html),
2004-05-12
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/05/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html),
2004-05-20
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004May/0087.html),
2004-06-04
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2004Jun/0105.html)
(not an exhaustive list).

Non-status-quo wording for this issue was integrated into the published
Working Draft of February 2005.

At the ftf of May 2005, the editors were instructed to prepare a revised
proposal for this issue.

Received on Friday, 10 February 2006 22:20:19 UTC