[Bug 2449] Datatype Valid is broken

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2449


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|needsAgreement              |needsReview




------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2006-01-28 17:43 -------
A wording proposal with a terse declarative reformulation of 
Datatype Valid and four variant wordings for a Note to follow 
it (with a less terse description of what is entailed by
the normative rule) went to the WG Friday 27 January 2006.

None of the formulations explicitly address the question
of identifying the basic member which actually
validates the value of a union datatype; if the WG
agrees that this is the right place to do that, that
will need to be added.

Received on Saturday, 28 January 2006 17:43:43 UTC