- From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:42:39 -0000
- To: "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "'Martin Duerst'" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Cc: <public-qt-comments@w3.org>, <www-international@w3.org>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#C073 has "Publicly interchanged content > SHOULD NOT use codepoints in the private use area." Reference to and > use of are equivalent concepts here. You might well argue that SHOULD > NOT is not MUST NOT, conformance checkers are nevertheless going to > point out violations of the SHOULD NOT requirement I fail to see how a conformance checker is supposed to know whether the content is being publicly interchanged. I would think that most conformance checkers are likely to give the user the benefit of the doubt, or at least to provide options. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 10:57:41 UTC