[Bug 1908] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for duration

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1908


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
           Keywords|needsDrafting               |resolved
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2006-01-14 16:09 -------
This issue (defining the lexical and canonical mappings for
duration) has been dogged by gaps in the linkage between the
WG's decision record and the XML source of the datatypes, with
resulting confusion.  The relevant material has long been in
the XML source of the datatypes spec, but it has not been
clear whether it had ever been reviewed or approved by the WG.

In preparing the Working Draft publication of this month,
however, the editors confirmed that the relevant material
formed part of the proposal for durations approved 18 December
2003; its omission from later Working Drafts resulted from
editorial error.  The material has been reinstated as
status-quo text in the Working Draft to be published this
month and in the WG-internal status-quo documents.

Accordingly, we can now in good conscience mark this issue 
resolved, and I am doing so now.

Received on Saturday, 14 January 2006 16:10:05 UTC