- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 02:07:14 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3258 ------- Comment #1 from davep@iit.edu 2006-05-10 02:07 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > In 3.3.8.4, fourth bullet, the reference to dayFrag should be to secondFrag. Known typo. > In 3.3.8.4, it is not made clear whether 2006-02-20T00:00:00 is equal to, or > identical to, 2006-02-19T24:00:00. Agreed, we could be more explicit. A 7-property date/time value cannot have a minute property whose value is 24; the lexical representation '2006-02-19T24:00:00' is mapped to (2006,2,20,0,0,0,absent). (The 7th property, with value absent, is the time zone.) > In 3.3.9.4, it is not made clear whether 00:00:00 is equal to, or identical to, > 24:00:00 (and how this interacts with timezones). See above for equal/identical. For better or for worse, 24:00:00 is 00:00:00 and hence preceeds all other untimezoned times (or, with timezone attached, all other times in that timezone). That said, the values interact WRT equality the same as other values. Compute the two values for timeOnTimeline and compare the resulting numbers.
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 02:07:21 UTC