- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 18:04:45 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3224 ------- Comment #1 from davep@iit.edu 2006-05-09 18:04 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > In the second paragraph of 2.2, I believe you mean 2.2.2. > what does the operator "<>" mean? (Not > equal? Not comparable?) Is it the same as the "/=" operator used in the > second paragraph of the subsequent Note? They are not quite the same, but in this case '<> NaN' should be replaced by 'not equal to itself'. > Reading on, I see that the > operators are defined later. A forward reference to the definition would be > useful. I'm not sure it's necessary for a note. There is nothing special about the use of '=' for equality; the final paragraph just confirms that the symbol means what it usually means. > In 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, the term "unequal" is used, but I can't find a > definition. In particular, it's not clear whether non-comparable pairs of > values are considered unequal. In common usage, "unequal" means "not equal". Do you really think this needs elaboration? I suppose the word could be eliminated everywhere, but is that worth the effort? Given that, "[Definition:] Two values that are neither equal, less-than, nor greater-than are incomparable" surely implies that incomparable values are not equal, hence unequal.
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 18:05:13 UTC