- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:36:47 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3241 Summary: Type hierarchy Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org QT approved comment: Type hierarchy: At the same time as introducing anyAtomicType, might not there be some sense in introducing anyListType and anyUnionType, and perhaps even anyComplexType? [For example, I think it would be useful on occasions in XSLT/XQuery to determine whether the type of an attribute is list-valued, and this could be done as "@a instance of attribute(*, xs:anyListType)". There are other solutions, such as introducing metadata interrogatives.]
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:36:50 UTC