- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:36:47 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3241
Summary: Type hierarchy
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
QT approved comment:
Type hierarchy:
At the same time as introducing anyAtomicType, might not there be some sense in
introducing anyListType and anyUnionType, and perhaps even anyComplexType?
[For example, I think it would be useful on occasions in XSLT/XQuery to
determine whether the type of an attribute is list-valued, and this could be
done as "@a instance of attribute(*, xs:anyListType)". There are other
solutions, such as introducing metadata interrogatives.]
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:36:50 UTC