- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:06:15 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3232
Summary: Type versus Datatype
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1 only
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
QT approved comment:
In 2.6.1.2, the second paragraph is an example of a residual use of the
word "type" rather than "datatype". This also occurs in constructs such as
"base type" and "item type". It's not clear whether the spec is trying to
make a distinction between the two words. "Union type" and "union datatype"
are used apparently interchangeably.
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:06:20 UTC