- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 10:06:15 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3232 Summary: Type versus Datatype Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org QT approved comment: In 2.6.1.2, the second paragraph is an example of a residual use of the word "type" rather than "datatype". This also occurs in constructs such as "base type" and "item type". It's not clear whether the spec is trying to make a distinction between the two words. "Union type" and "union datatype" are used apparently interchangeably.
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 10:06:20 UTC