- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:57:29 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3227 Summary: Mapping value space to lexical space Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 only Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org QT approved comment. (Note, in all these comments I am using section numbers as they appear in the change-highlighted version of the document). For completeness it might be worth mentioning in 2.4 that every value in the value space of a datatype has at least one lexical representation: ff indeed this is true (see discussion on union and list types below). In the first sentence of 2.4.1 the word "generally" is misused to mean "usually". In 2.6.1.2 I would expect a more formal statement that the value space of a list type is the set of sequences of values of the item type, minus any values of the item type all of whose lexical representations contain whitespace. In 2.6.1.3: is it true that the value space of a union type is the union of the value spaces of the basic member types? Possibly not, because if there are lexical representations shared by the member value spaces, then values of some of the member types may become "unreachable", in which case they are presumably excluded from the value space (because every value must have at least one lexical representation).
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 09:57:35 UTC