- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:08:18 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2315
Summary: Where Parts 1 and 2 share topics, what is normative
where?
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.1
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 1: Structures
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
We need a clean story about which constraints are expressed
normatively in part 1 and which in part 2. This affects
the definitions of the special simple types, the tableaux,
and every other topic touched on by both parts of the spec.
This issue is attached to just one of the parts, but the
requirement to DECIDE what the story is belongs equally to
both parts. (Once we decide, we may need to clone this
bug in order to track the task of adjusting the text in
each part to match our story.)
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 14:09:17 UTC