- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:08:18 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2315 Summary: Where Parts 1 and 2 share topics, what is normative where? Product: XML Schema Version: 1.1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org We need a clean story about which constraints are expressed normatively in part 1 and which in part 2. This affects the definitions of the special simple types, the tableaux, and every other topic touched on by both parts of the spec. This issue is attached to just one of the parts, but the requirement to DECIDE what the story is belongs equally to both parts. (Once we decide, we may need to clone this bug in order to track the task of adjusting the text in each part to match our story.)
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 14:09:17 UTC