- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:20:05 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2219 Summary: R-227: identity constraints and xsi:nil Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org If an element selected by the field of an identity constraint has xsi:nil='true', is the value treated as missing? For example, is the following instance valid, given the schema. schema ------ <xml version="1.0"?> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xsd:element name="root"> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element ref="uid" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType> <xsd:unique id="foo123" name="uuid"> <xsd:selector xpath=".//uid"/> <xsd:field xpath="."/> </xsd:unique> </xsd:element> <xsd:element name="uid" nillable="true" type="xsd:anySimpleType"/> </xsd:schema> instance -------- <xml version="1.0"?> <root xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="idF018.xsd"> <uid xsi:nil="true" xsi:type="xsd:string"/> <uid xsi:nil="true"/> </root> I think this should be valid since the xsi:nil attribute on the uid elements would be equivalent to the elements missing for the purposes of identity constraints. Either way 3.11.4 of Schema part 1 could use some clarification around xsi:nil. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003JulSep/0024.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 19:20:17 UTC