- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:13:49 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2210 Summary: R-218: Clarification required for complexContent extending simpleContent Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Consider <complexType name="derived" mixed="false"> <complexContent mixed="false"> <extension base="base"/> </complexContent> </complexType> where "base" is a complex type whose {content type} is a simple type definition. Then according to structure 3.4.2, "derived" has the same content type as base, which is a simple type definition. But it specified <complexContent> explicitly, and mixed = false. This seems confusing. And if mixed was true on <complexType> and <complexContent> then the rule actually says that "derived" has a content of a sequence of an empty sequence, following the particle from "base". But "base" doesn't have a particle. (Rules from 3.4.6 says this is invalid, but those are at the component level. Here we are talking about the mapping.) IMO, <complexContent> shouldn't be allowed to extend a complex type with simple content. That is, change bullet 1 of the constraint "Complex Type Definition Representation OK" [1] to 1 If the <complexContent> alternative is chosen, then all of the following must be true: 1.1 The type definition resolved to by the actual value of the base [attribute] must be a complex type definition; 1.2 If the <extension> alternative is also chosen, then the type definition resolved to by the actual value of the base [attribute] must not be a complex type definition whose {content type} is a simple type definition; [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2002/09/xmlschema-1/structures-with- errata.html#src-ct See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003JanMar/0048.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 19:13:51 UTC