- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:06:25 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2200 Summary: R-208: Question about the lexical space of NOTATION types Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 2: Datatypes AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Section 3.2.19 of the datatypes spec states: "[Definition:] NOTATION represents the NOTATION attribute type from [XML 1.0 (Second Edition)]. The value space of NOTATION is the set QNames of notations declared in the current schema. The lexical space of NOTATION is the set of all names of notations declared in the current schema (in the form of QNames)." Note that the "lexical space" is "the set of all names of notations declared ..." Here "lexical space" is a set of strings, but "names of notations" are QNames, which are not strings (and they don't/can't give strings either, because QNames don't have canonical reps). IMO, since "the set of QNames of notations declared" is already mentioned for the value space of NOTATION, it's sufficient to say "the set of strings that match the QName production of [Namespaces in XML]" for the lexical space. Erratum E2-34 did clarify NOTATION's value space, but this issue was not covered. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2003JanMar/0055.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 19:06:43 UTC