- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:45:37 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2182 Summary: R-189: Recursive simple type definitions Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Is the following recursive definition valid? <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="http://foo.com" xmlns="http://foo.com" elementFormDefault="qualified"> <xsd:simpleType name="abcOrBoolean"> <xsd:union memberTypes="xsd:boolean abc"/> <xsd:simpleType> <xsd:simpleType name="abc"> <xsd:restriction base="abcOrBoolean"> <xsd:minLength value="5"/> <xsd:restriction> <xsd:simpleType> <xsd:schema> Henry's response: "Not allowed. There is an erratum forthcoming which is intended to clarify this, but, irritatingly, it doesn't catch the above case. I expect yet another erratum will do so." See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002OctDec/0124.html
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 18:45:48 UTC