[Bug 2156] R-160: Question re: validity of type override with union type from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2005-09-14 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2005)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:14:23 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EFYxr-00087j-KZ@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2156


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-14 15:14 -------
Discussed at the Sept. 19 conference call. 

RESOLVED: to class R-160 as clarification without erratum (i.e. no change is 
required). PVB to draft reply to commentator on R-160.

Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2005 15:14:33 UTC