[Bug 2144] R-153: Is the public attribute of notation optional? from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2005-09-12 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2005)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:41:55 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EErNT-0004x9-HP@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2144


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-12 16:41 -------
Discussed at Sept. 13 telecon. The WG agreed that the S4S is likely in error, 
but HT to verify w/ Richard Tobin, and then draft erratum.

Resolution:
Final text available at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/att-0312/01-R-
161etc.html

Text reviewed and approved at Nov 1 telecon. 

Erratum E1-16 added

Received on Monday, 12 September 2005 16:42:06 UTC