- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:15:06 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2113
Summary: R-124: A question about PSVI properties
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 1: Structures
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
There are various statements in the spec of the form: "If some condition, x, is
true, then, in the post-schema-validation infoset it has the properties
a,b,c ..."
For example:
"If an element is valid with respect to a type definition, as per Element
Locally Valid (Type), in the post-schema-validation infoset the item has a
property ...
Furthermore, the item has one of the following alternative sets of properties:
[type definition]
...
"
Is it true that if condition x does *not hold*, then the processor is *not
permitted* to include properties a,b,c in the PSVI, even if such information is
available? I'm assuming this is what was intended, based on the clarifications
drafted for the Query WG on the topic of PSVI.
If this is the case, should the Structures spec clarify this? ...perhaps with
wording similiar to: "The properties a, b, c are in the PSVI if and only
if ..."
As an aside, wouldn't it be useful to get at type information for an element
that was not valid, if the processor had that information?
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 15:15:13 UTC