- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:37:04 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2091 sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2005-09-09 03:37 ------- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0073.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0074.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0075.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0076.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0077.html Resolution: Discussed at the Feb. 7 concall: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Feb/0017.html The WG resolved that the example given does violate UPA, and the text quoted merits clarification. Henry to propose erratum. Proposed erratum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema- ig/2002Oct/att-0313/01-R-101etc.html Erratum reviewed/approved at the Nov. 1 telecon. E1-29 added.
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 03:37:10 UTC