- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:22:09 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2084 Summary: R-094: Issues with identity constraints and derivation by restriction Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org In the section titled 'Schema Component Constraint: Particle Restriction OK (Elt:Elt -- NameAndTypeOK)', the following is mentioned: "For an element declaration particle to be a valid restriction of another element declaration particle all of the following must be true: 5 R's declaration's {identity-constraint definitions} is a subset of B's declaration's {identity-constraint definitions}, if any." The issues are: the spec should be clarified to state what "subset" means the subset requirement runs the wrong way -- the derived element's IC's should be a _super_set of the base's. an element decl in a restriction can't have the same ICs as its corresponding decl in the base, because that would violate the named-components-are-unique constraint The original questions were posted to the schema-dev list. Henry summarized the issues in the following mail on schema-comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0187.html and: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0188.html
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 03:22:14 UTC