- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:22:09 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2084
Summary: R-094: Issues with identity constraints and derivation
by restriction
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 1: Structures
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
In the section titled 'Schema Component Constraint: Particle Restriction OK
(Elt:Elt -- NameAndTypeOK)', the following is mentioned:
"For an element declaration particle to be a valid restriction of another
element declaration particle all of the following must be true:
5 R's declaration's {identity-constraint definitions} is a subset of B's
declaration's {identity-constraint definitions}, if any."
The issues are:
the spec should be clarified to state what "subset" means
the subset requirement runs the wrong way -- the derived element's IC's should
be a _super_set of the base's.
an element decl in a restriction can't have the same ICs as its corresponding
decl in the base, because that would violate the named-components-are-unique
constraint
The original questions were posted to the schema-dev list. Henry summarized the
issues in the following mail on schema-comments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0187.html
and:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0188.html
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 03:22:14 UTC