- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:16:46 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2080 ------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2005-09-09 03:16 ------- Ashok's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0125.html Resolution: The WG agreed that the minimum number of digits needs to be specified. The WG agreed that a canonical form needs to be chosen for "24:00:00" for the various types. Proposed errata text for the 2 issues: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2002Jan/0038.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2002Jan/0039.html Text discussed at the Feb. 7 concall: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Feb/0017.html Further discussion of the decisions to be made for the text launched on the ig list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Feb/0046.html Further discussion at the Apr. 11 telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Apr/0025.html The only remaining issue to be resolved is item 5 from list of questions. Status 06/28: Discussed at length at the June 14, 20 and 28 concalls. No consensus was reached. Latest discussion and summary of open issues can be found at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Jul/0004.html Discussed and resolved at the July f2f http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2002/07/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html#ab3b3b3b5 Paul Biron to produce errata text. Discussed again at the Oct. 25 telecon. WG resolved that the minimum number of digits to be supported is 3. Ashok drafted some text - see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/2003May/0028.html Part of the proposed text, i.e. the conformance note, was approved at the May 23,2003 telecon. Additional text, describing behaviour when a processor receives more digits than it supports is still pending approval.
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 03:16:48 UTC