- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:08:13 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2075 ------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2005-09-09 03:08 ------- Henry's response: This should be clarified in the REC -- the intention is that unprefixed names are qualified iff there is a default namespace declaration in scope, i.e. as per element names, not attribute names, in XML 1.0 plus Namespaces. The definition should also make clear that the value space includes pairs of "no known namespace", local name, which correspond to unprefixed QNames when no default declaration is in scope. Resolution: Henry Thompson to draft erratum text reflecting discussion above.
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 03:08:26 UTC