- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:58:45 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2068 Summary: R-078: Issue to do with definition of substitution groups, block, and UPA Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Consider the following example: <element name="e1" block="substitution"/> <element name="e2" substitutionGroup="s:e1"/> <complexType name="t"> <choice> <element ref="s:e1"/> <element ref="s:e2"/> </choice> </complexType> The choice violates the constraints for UPA, because "e2" is in "e1"'s substitution group. However, "e2" can never substitute "e1". Should the definition of substitution group (Schema Component Constraint: Substitution Group) be modified? See bullet 1 from: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0049.html
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 02:58:48 UTC