- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:58:45 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2068
Summary: R-078: Issue to do with definition of substitution
groups, block, and UPA
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 1: Structures
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Consider the following example:
<element name="e1" block="substitution"/>
<element name="e2" substitutionGroup="s:e1"/>
<complexType name="t">
<choice>
<element ref="s:e1"/>
<element ref="s:e2"/>
</choice>
</complexType>
The choice violates the constraints for UPA, because "e2" is in "e1"'s
substitution group. However, "e2" can never substitute "e1".
Should the definition of substitution group (Schema Component Constraint:
Substitution Group) be modified?
See bullet 1 from:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001OctDec/0049.html
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 02:58:48 UTC