[Bug 2065] R-076: Question about content type EMPTY from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2005-09-09 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2005)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:55:15 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EDZ2p-0003ty-GD@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2065


sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME




------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2005-09-09 02:55 -------
The WG decided (at the 01/03/2002 telecon) that the commentator interpreted the 
rules correctly and they were in fact intended. Also, it should be noted, that 
there are different validation semantics for elements of type "foo" and "bar".

Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 02:55:30 UTC