- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:32:41 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2056 ------- Additional Comments From sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2005-09-09 02:32 ------- Henry's response: No, but the REC isn't completely clear about this. Clause 1 above could probably usefully be changed to read "They are the same named type definition". See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2001Jun/0012.html Further email and thoughts from Henry: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2001Nov/0037.html Status 2002/01: Henry to propose a resolution/text. Status 2002/02: Proposed resolution and follow-on email from Henry: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Feb/0013.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Feb/0027.html
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 02:32:45 UTC