- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:32:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2056
Summary: R-067: A question about type derivation and anonymous
types
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XSD Part 1: Structures
AssignedTo: ht@w3.org
ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Schema Component Constraint: Type Derivation OK (Simple) lists conditions under
which a simple type D is considered to be validly derived from another simple
type B. The first condition is:
"1 They are the same type definition."
Is possible for 2 anonymous simple type definitions to be considered "the same
type definition"?
See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2001Jun/0010.html
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 02:32:04 UTC