- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:32:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2056 Summary: R-067: A question about type derivation and anonymous types Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Schema Component Constraint: Type Derivation OK (Simple) lists conditions under which a simple type D is considered to be validly derived from another simple type B. The first condition is: "1 They are the same type definition." Is possible for 2 anonymous simple type definitions to be considered "the same type definition"? See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2001Jun/0010.html
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 02:32:04 UTC