- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 03:07:04 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2039 Summary: value constraints with type ENTITY/ENTITIES Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org When a value constraint is specified on an element/attribute declaration, it's required for the canonical lexical representation to be "string valid" with respect to the type. When the type is or is derived from ENTITY or ENTITIES, "string valid" requires that entity values need to be "declared entity name"s. 2 questions: - Should we enforce "entity" constraints when checking value constraint values? (I tend to think the answer should be "No".) - Assume the answer to the above question is yes, then do the values need to be entity names declared in the schema document?
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 03:07:10 UTC