[Bug 1836] RQ-100 define canonical form for language type, update RFC reference from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2005-09-07 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2005)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 21:48:16 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1ED7mC-00016G-A1@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1836


cmsmcq@w3.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Additional Comments From cmsmcq@w3.org  2005-09-07 21:48 -------
A proposal revising the presentation of language in XML Schema 1.1
was adopted by the Working Group at its meeting of 26 August.

A note warning that no case folding occurs (so the canonical
form is the same as the input lexical form) was added, as
well as a note warning that only some of the constraints
imposed by RFC 3066 are enforced as part of datatype
validity.

Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2005 21:48:20 UTC