- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 20:08:54 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2012 Summary: R-034: Potential problem with description of final for simpleType in Structures Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSD Part 1: Structures AssignedTo: ht@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Section 3.14.6 of Structures states the following for bullet 4: If the {base type definition} is not the simple ur-type definition, all of the following must be true: 4.1 The definition must be a valid restriction as defined in Derivation Valid (Restriction, Simple). 4.2 If {variety} is not atomic, then the appropriate case among the following must be true: 4.2.1 If the {variety} is list, then the {final} of the {base type definition} must not contain list. 4.2.2 If the {variety} is union, then the {final} of the {base type definition} must not contain union. However, lists and unions have the ur-type definition as a base. And, shouldn't the following rules be stated? If the {variety} is list, then the {final} of the {item type definition} must not contain list. If the {variety} is union, then the {final} of all the {member type definitions} must not contain union. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001AprJun/0294.html Henry's response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001AprJun/0296.html
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2005 20:09:02 UTC