Re: Non-primitive built-in simple types

> There is still "magic" associated with integer:  Canonical 
representations
> of integers are not the canonical representations of the same numbers as
> decimals; a no-magic derivation should not change canonical 
representations.

Right...I always forget about canonical reps...since they don't play a 
part in schema processing at all...and since we almost voted to get ride 
of them completely (I wish the WG had gotten ride of them).

pvb

Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2005 20:39:36 UTC