- From: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:36:48 -0700
- To: davep@iit.edu
- Cc: Alain.Frisch@inria.fr, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
> There is still "magic" associated with integer: Canonical representations > of integers are not the canonical representations of the same numbers as > decimals; a no-magic derivation should not change canonical representations. Right...I always forget about canonical reps...since they don't play a part in schema processing at all...and since we almost voted to get ride of them completely (I wish the WG had gotten ride of them). pvb
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2005 20:39:36 UTC