Thursday, 31 March 2005
Wednesday, 30 March 2005
Friday, 25 March 2005
Friday, 18 March 2005
- Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...
- Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...
Thursday, 17 March 2005
- Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...
- Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...
Wednesday, 16 March 2005
- Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...
- Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...
- Re: It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...
- Element Declarations Consistent and valid type substitutions via xsi:type
- Re: float / double values out of range - INF as closest value?
- Enumeration facet value needs clarification -- 2
- Enumeration facet value needs clarification
Monday, 14 March 2005
- xpath as primitive type in XML Schema
- float / double values out of range - INF as closest value?
- Fw: Q: Fixed value constraint validation for elements
- fixed property of constraining facets
- constraint "minExclusive <= maxExclusive"
- regarding E1-6: Whitespace and identity constraint XPath expressions
Wednesday, 9 March 2005
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- conditional occurrences of child elements
Tuesday, 8 March 2005
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
Monday, 7 March 2005
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- RE: Representation of floating point values.
- Representation of floating point values.
Friday, 4 March 2005
Monday, 7 March 2005
Sunday, 6 March 2005
- RE: [xml-dev] clarification needed for include
- RE: [xml-dev] clarification needed for include
- clarification needed for include
Friday, 4 March 2005
- Fw: Submission for next revision of XML Schema
- Identity constraints and skip wildcard
- Fw: Clarification needed on validation rules for "skipped" subtree
- Clarification needed on element assessment
- Potential erratum: strictly assessed but not assessed?
- The order between xsi:type and element declaration
Tuesday, 1 March 2005
- Re: XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
- Re: XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
- RE: XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
- RE: XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
- RE: XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
- RE: XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
- RE: XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
- Re: XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
- XSD 1.1 issue: when did timezones cease being durations?
Tuesday, 22 February 2005
Friday, 18 February 2005
Friday, 28 January 2005
- Re: issue regarding upper and lower bounds (another problem with paternalism)
- issue regarding upper and lower bounds (another problem with paternalism)
Wednesday, 26 January 2005
Tuesday, 25 January 2005
- Re: in XML schemas, can ALL groups be combined?
- Errata suggestion for XML Schema Part 0:Primer Second Edition
- Define general element
- Proposed addition to XML Schema 1.1: N from sequence
- It seems to be a problem with the XML Schema for Schemas which is normative...
- in XML schemas, can ALL groups be combined?